- National Predictive Service Group (NPSG)
-
Meeting Notes
Location: National Interagency
Members Present:
Guests:
Notetaker:
Lani Williams
Meeting Agenda Topics:
1. Introductions & Meeting Logistics Tom
2. Project funding status Tom
a) FY-2004 report
b) FY-2005 proposal process Tom/Kim
3. Lessons Learned - 2004 (season review along with unresolved and emerging issues) including a review of November Intell/Met meeting agenda and expected results
a) Intell (30 minutes) Deb
b) Met (30 minutes) Rick
c) NWS (30 minutes) Rusty
4. Intelligence Coordinators Report Deb
a) Intelligence
Training update
b) SIT/209
c) Ownership vs. Protection Reporting update Kim
5. Web Task Group Charter Gerry/Jay Ellington
· Conference call with Jay Ellington
6. NPSG Framework Gerry
a) Discussion of where we are and where we need to go
b) User Assessment status/need
c) Include action items, assignments, completion dates and funding
d) National Park
Service Fire Ecology Program Strategic Plan Chip
7. Fire Environment Working Team Update Gerry/Paul Schlobohm
8.
9. Standardized Products for GACCs Rick
10. NPS Fire Ecology Program Chip
11. Research How do we get Plugged in Tom/Gerry
a) Opportunities for getting topic areas in front of research
b) FS logic model update
c) How to integrate into project proposal/funding process
d) Other
12. AMS Meeting Fall 2005 (see notes from last meeting) Rick
a) Special section on Predictive Services
b) Who should represent NPSG?
c) Update on how and what NPSG representative should discuss
13. Predictive Services Conference/Symposium- (see notes from last meeting) Gerry
14. Validation & Verification (Conference call with Chuck Maxwell)
a) Adherence
to consensus decision on 2004 verification process Chuck Maxwell
b) Update
on what will be presented at Nov. Intel/Met meeting Tom/Chuck
15. Integrating Decision Support into Predictive Services Gerry
a) Update on Don McGregors visit to NWCC during summer of 2004 (30 min)
b) Resource Allocation Topic (30 min) Neal Hitchock and Michael Bevins
16. User Feedback and Bin Items All
a) AWIPS Equipment Heath
b) ROMAN Ed Delgado
c) Red Flag Fuels/Large Fire Potential
d) National Seasonal Assessment Workshop Funding
e) Where to take Spot Weather Forecast Policy Rusty
f) Agenda for January Meeting
g) Pending Actions
h) Prep
for Predictive Services
17. Next Meeting; January 18-20 (
· Logistics and Topics
Exhibits
A. Pending Action Items Tracking Table 5 pgs
B. Completed Action Items Tracking Table 6 pgs
C. NPSG Funding and Project Status 2 pgs
D. NPSG Framework and Goals-Final Draft 14 pgs
E. Lessons Learned 2004 Meteorologists 1 pgs
F. Lessons Learned 2004 National Weather Service 2 pgs
G. Fire Environment Working Team (FENWT) 2 pgs
H. Fire Weather Center Proposal 2 pgs
I. National Park Service Fire Ecology Program Strategic Plan: 2004-2008 28 pgs
J. Standard Products for Predictive Services 3 pgs
K. Charles Maxwell Email 1 pgs
L. Gridded
FX-Net Project Proposal 1 pgs
Tuesday
Project Funding Status Tom: (Exhibit C)
ROMAN
· Approved as an application in the BLM IT Portfolio in FY-06.
· NPSG has provided funding that should carry the program through December 2004.
Decision: Arrange a conference call this week with Ed
Delgado for update of:
·
Plan for 2005
·
Contingency
·
Options/Plans
Gridded-FX Net
· Hardware purchased with yearend money.
Red Flag Fuels Criteria
· Not funded
· Submitted to JFSP
· Denied as being too operational
Predictive Services Product Verification Study
· Not funded
Resource Utilization Study
· Needed for Cheetah default values
· Data is complete through July 2003
Decision: Need to arrange for follow up and completion
of data input into spreadsheet that Tom and Don Carlton developed. Kim was unaware the resource utilization data
had not been updated and agreed to appoint someone to complete the data input
through 2004.
User Assessment Plan
· Unable to find someone with current contract to task prior to the end of FY-04
Decision:
Need to follow up with user assessment in 2005.
National Seasonal Assessment Workshop
· Funded by NPSG Climas and NOAA for $15,000 in 2004
· Climas and NOAA may not be providing funding for 2005
Decision: Summary of FY-05 funding will be focused on
three areas: National Seasonal
Assessment Workshops, User Assessment and Standardized Products.
Funding Proposal Process Rick/Kim:
A proposal process has not been worked out yet. Although funding is limited a process is still needed so that proposals can be prioritized.
Intelligence Coordinators Report Deb
· Intelligence Training Update There will be three levels of Intell Dispatchers. Qualifications will be managed by the Dispatch Training Steering Committee with oversight from the Intell Working Group.
·
SIT/209 The SIT/209 Committee is proposing
developing an official Change Board. The
Committee also needs to be tied in with the Fire Occurrence Working Group.
· Ownership/Protection Reporting Update To be covered later.
Lessons Learned 2004 Meteorologists Rick: (Exhibit E)
With the
exception of
Predictive Services Agreements:
· Validation of ERC FM G and update of products was not done by all of the GACCs.
· Need to find a way to insure accountability in that agreements and commitments are acted upon
BlueSky/RAINS
· USFS is considering studying a request by EPA to implement BlueSky/RAINS in the West.
Lessons Learned 2004 National Weather Service Rusty: (Exhibit F)
· Below average number of IMET Dispatches
· NWS cosigned FENWT Charter (first NWCG Charter for the NWS)
· Verification of NFDRS sites NWS needs a list of RAWS sites that meet NFDRS Standards
· IMET Role Expansion Team Studying the feasibility and requirements to expand IMET support to all-hazards.
· Spot Forecasts requests continue to increase Requesting review of policies to assist in defining a formal process.
Web Task Group Charter Jay Ellington:
The Charter was modeled after other NWCG Charters. The group is comprised of the former Task Force Members:
Jay Ellington, SWC, Chair
Ed Delgado, EBC
Steve Marion, EAC
Tom Rolinski, OSC
Kathy Wiegard, WBC
Dan Ervin, NIFC, Ad Hoc Member
A
presentation will be made at the Predictive Services/Intelligence Meeting next
week. The Host Server is scheduled to be
available in January. The National
Webpage should be posted early 2005. GACCs will be required to use the new
template by
Decision: Charter was approved.
Kim will send out letter that
will include expectations and implementation dates.
Accountability will be a
subject at the Coordinators Meeting.
Jay will work with Dan on
obstacles and pinch points for Host Server implementation.
NPSG Liaison to the Web Group
will be Rick.
Jay will update NPSG at the
January Meeting. (2004-32)
NPSG Framework Gerry: (Exhibit D)
Objectives:
Deal with comments that were received Find a way to address in Framework or capture in next phase.
In exploring the possibility of a User Assessment task from the previous meeting additional requirements were discovered that made the option unattainable.
·
Goal 1
User Assessment
Guidance is needed to determine the best way to solicit comments from users.
Other groups may also be looking at surveys (e.g. FENWT)
Advantage to doing one large survey versus same groups having to complete several surveys
Survey costs could be reduced through partnerships
NPSG could develop the survey and PowerPoint presentations and present them to each GACC
Social
Science Research Meeting in
Decision:
Identify advisor for Goal (possibilities
including: NCRS or Don MacGregor).
Invite
Advisor to the January meeting to develop a course of action that the group can
accomplish. (2004-33)
Decision: See Goal 1.
Invite Kim Kelly from NWCC to discuss findings from work
with the Predictive Services unit at NWCC and at the facilitated GIS Session at
the Predictive Service Meeting scheduled for the first week of November in
Before this Goal can be discussed more information is
needed about where we are at. A
questionnaire could be distributed to Meteorologists, Intelligence Coordinators
and Center Managers. Need to look at
obstacles to accomplishing the current workload pinch points. Examples include:
Technology
Data
Staffing/Collateral Duties
Expertise (analytical skills)
Travel Budget
Priorities
Organization
Operating Plan for office
Key success and accomplishments should also be
requested. This response should be more
open-ended:
RAWS data quality
New products developed
Products issued